|










| |
These
boxes are for sale - click here!
|
They ain't perfect,
but what is? All boxes have their resonances and "funny
spots", and these are no exception. But over all they sound
very nice from top to bottom. One of the best sounding rigs here
in town is either EAW KF695Zs or
Yorkville U15s,
driven by a DriveRack
and PL236s.
The guy who owns this rig likes my LS8695s a lot, especially the highs. I have
yet to hear of anyone who does not like them. If
Danley Sound
Labs made a
box that was say 90 degrees horizontal x 30
degrees (or less) vertical, that would be very tempting, since it would
no doubt play louder. But until then, I'll likely be sticking with the
LS8695s.
The LS8695's claimed horizontal dispersion is 100 degrees. It
seems to be quite a bit wider over a fairly wide bandwidth. When
walking the room during a show, I can often understand most of the
lyrics when standing where I cannot even see the front of the
cabinets. Common wisdom is that one wants pattern control in a
narrow or reverberant room, to keep sound off the walls and directed to
listeners. Thus, the LS8695 would be contraindicated. Such
seems not to be the case with these boxes. I've had them in rooms
that were skinny and deep, wide and short, and large & square.
As compared to both front loaded and horn loaded "point
source" boxes, Intelligibility, SPL, and frequency balance have
been more consistent throughout every room in which I have tried them,
except for two. (In both rooms the speakers were very far
from the side walls, which are very reflective, so the sidewall
reflections arrived very late. However in another very wide room, a
domed-ceiling theater that is a 72' x 72' reverb chamber, there did not
seem to be any place in the room where the reflected sound came anywhere
near to equaling the direct sound. The provider who rented them
from me for that gig was very pleased, and the venue manager said that
attendees commented that this was the only intelligible speech and
enjoyable music that they had heard in that room.) (One downside
to the ultra-wide dispersion is that these boxes spill a lot of sound
onto the stage. This can compromise gain-before-feedback in a
number of situations. I have a parametric inserted in my vocal
subgroup to take care of it.)
These speakers "throw" like crazy. My measurements
confirm that as SLS claims, the SPL reduction as the distance from the
speaker doubles really is only about 3dB, as opposed to the usual
6dB. And unlike "point source" boxes, you can walk right
up to an LS8695 without getting your head blown off. In fact, as
you approach them, past a certain point they get quieter. And,
while you are there visually inspecting the pretty gold ribbon, you can
hear the box on the other side of the stage.
Keep in mind that these things have only 2 degrees of vertical
dispersion. If you are below or above the ends of the box, the
treble dies, so they must be ground stacked. But since they
don't kill the folks in front, and they are so skinny, you can get away
with putting them places that other boxes won't go. Once you know
where the front row is, play with the height a bit, and of course you
can tilt them forward if it helps. Having them "too
close" to the side walls does not cause much of a problem - in fact
after EQing out any hot spots you may find that the proximity to the
wall has fattened them up nicely.
They sound very good indeed, but these aren't the loudest things in the
world - life is a compromise. I mostly do rock bands in bars, and
a few have really maxed these things out. I'm using one box per
side. I have not gone active yet (I need time in a big room with a
Smaart savvy friend, as "playing by ear" has not yielded good
results). SLS's passive crossover can be ordered with a biwire
option - it separates the inputs to the crossover's low pass and high
pass sections: low pass = NL4 pin set 1, high pass = NL4 pin set 2. At
the rack, you can connect the two pairs in your 12-4 speaker cable to
one amp channel or two (both fed with the same full range signal). I'm
driving each box with a pair of bridged Crown
K1s, which gives me 1100 on the top and 1500 on the bottom (K1s are
not enough poop dual channel, and K2s don't sound as good). My
processor's limiters are set to brickwall the amps' output at 38vRMS,
per SLS' recommendation. If I were starting from scratch, I'd try
a PL236
on each side, as they sound good and should (I think) be able to handle
a pair of boxes.
Misc.: The boxes have fly points on the top, bottom, and sides.
SLS now have a couple of mounting gadgets (which used to be shown on
their website). Since I just have one box per side, I use
the bottom points to bolt the boxes to the top of my amp racks.
The drunks have to hit them very hard before they'll fall over.
The handles are on the back, which is handy if you are putting them in
coffin cases.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |